Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) The misstatement must relate to the substance that the item is made of.
B) The misstatement must have been a significant factor in the plaintiff's decision to enter into the contract, and cannot relate to an opinion or prediction.
C) The misstatement must have been a correct statement at some point in the past.
D) The misstatement can relate to any fact before or after the contract was formed.
E) The misstatement must not involve an issue of law.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) duress.
B) fraud in the inducement.
C) undue influence.
D) the parol evidence rule.
E) fraud in the inception.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Courts allow rescission of a contract if there is a mutual mistake of value as opposed to a mutual mistake of fact.
B) Courts allow rescission of a contract if there is a mutual mistake of fact as opposed to a mutual mistake of value.
C) Courts allow rescission of a contract for either a mutual mistake of fact or a mutual mistake of value.
D) Courts do not allow rescission of a contract for either a mutual mistake of fact or a mutual mistake of value.
E) Courts never allow rescission of a contract unless fraud is shown.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) perfect parity
B) equal parity
C) due diligence
D) equal dignity
E) perfect dignity
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Jill will win, because this writing is not sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
B) Jack will win, because the writing is sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
C) Jill will win, because Jack did not sign the contract.
D) Jack will win, because the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this situation.
E) Jill will win, because there was no reasonable basis for her to believe there as an enforceable contract.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The Statute of Frauds does not apply to easements.
B) Express easements must be in writing to be enforceable, while implied easements need not be written.
C) Implied easements must be in writing to be enforceable, while express easements need not be in writing.
D) Both express and implied easements must be in writing to be enforceable.
E) Although the Statute of Frauds does generally apply to easements, neither express nor implied easements must be in writing to be enforceable.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) abeyance
B) a reasonable period of time
C) good faith
D) mitigation
E) equity
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The reliance must have caused damage to the plaintiff.
B) The plaintiff must be able to prove the reliance in a court of law.
C) The misstatement relied upon by the plaintiff must have been the only factor in the plaintiff's decision to enter into the contract.
D) The plaintiff must be able to prove why the defendant made the false statement.
E) The plaintiff can recover only if the belief of the false statement was reasonable.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 168
Related Exams