FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 4: The Exclusionary Rule

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 61

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Illegally seized evidence and the "fruit of the poisonous tree" are:

A) admissible under certain exceptions.
B) not subject to the exclusionary rule.
C) never admissible under any circumstances.
D) None of the answers are correct.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 62

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

For this evidence to be admissible and not a violation of the exclusionary rule,

A) no search warrant is needed,because of the principle of inevitable discovery.
B) no search warrant is needed,because it is independent source.
C) a search warrant would have been needed.
D) no search warrant is needed,because the actions occurring in the apartment were illegal.

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 63

Short Answer

Review LaterAdd Note

The 1914 decision in which the U.S.Supreme Court decided that the exclusionary rule applied in all federal prosecutions was _________v.United States.

The exclusionary rule applies to illegally seized evidence (the primary evidence).

The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to_________ police misconduct.

The primary purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter misconduct by:

If the officers obtained verbal consent,but the department policy required a written consent,it is not a violation of the exclusionary rule,because

Police today are more professional and have more training as a result of:

If a neighbor had conducted the search and found the evidence,then called the officers,it is admissible,because it is

Which of the following options for the exclusionary rule do you think is best? Explain your position. A.Totally abolish the exclusionary rule B.Create more exceptions to the exclusionary rule C.Abolish the exceptions to the exclusionary rule

U.S.Supreme Court decisions strongly suggest that the exclusionary rule applies only to Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases.

Which of the following is an alternative to the exclusionary rule?

The exclusionary rule provides that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is:

Is the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule weaker or stronger today compared to the periods of the Weeks and Mapp decisions? Why has this occurred? Do you think this is a good or bad trend? Explain your position and provide examples.

Mapp v.Ohio and Miranda v.Arizona were important in the additional powers of discretion they gave to law enforcement officers

Which of the following is an exception to the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine?

The prosecution must show beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence erroneously admitted did not contribute to the conviction in order to prove:

In Britain,illegally obtained evidence is admitted in court,but the:

Evidence that is obtained through the use of illegally obtained evidence is called the_________ .

To prove_________ error,the prosecution must show beyond a reasonable doubt that the evidence erroneously admitted did not contribute to the conviction.