Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It restricts defendants from continuing their employment.
B) It offers a low-cost housing alternative to incarceration of nonviolent offenders.
C) It allows offenders to leave the facility only if they are accompanied by a staff member.
D) It permits offenders to return to their homes in the evenings.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) They are most often used for high-risk offenders.
B) They tend to be more restrictive than prison.
C) They are generally used as a way to reduce the correctional population.
D) They are never used as alternatives to incarceration at initial sentencing.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a marked concentration on rehabilitation of offenders.
B) the lack of treatment and referral programs to assist offenders.
C) a restriction on participants to return home in the evenings.
D) correctional options that are more inhibiting than incarceration.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is non-punitive and permits offenders to stay outdoors when not at work.
B) It contributes to rehabilitation by allowing offenders to support their families.
C) It costs significantly more than incarceration.
D) It cannot monitor a person's physical location continuously.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) They prevent the reintegration of offenders into the community.
B) They are a more expensive correctional option than jail sentencing.
C) They are generally more restrictive than prison.
D) They promote rehabilitation of offenders in society.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Ohio.
B) Florida.
C) California.
D) New York.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) to maintain high rearrest rates.
B) to increase parole caseloads to 100 or more.
C) to protect the community.
D) to decrease surveillance over activities of offenders.
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Multiple Choice
A) drug courts have lowered the rates of recidivism among drug offenders.
B) drug courts are less cost-effective than probation owing to increased victimization costs.
C) drug courts award punishments that are more severe than incarceration.
D) drug courts have significantly increased the rate of rearrests among drug offenders.
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
Short Answer
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 21 - 40 of 65
Related Exams