Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Two businesses-Berry Farms LLC and Canned Jams Inc.-dispute the quality of goods delivered by the seller and the price agreed to by the buyer. With regard to this dispute, the two parties can


A) any of the choices.
B) litigate it.
C) settle it between themselves.
D) resolve it through an alternative method, such as arbitration.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A

The simplest form of alternative dispute resolution is mediation.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

That a favorable court decision will be likely to remedy an injury is an element of standing.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The availability of different remedies is a factor that can affect


A) a party's decision to litigate in a certain court.
B) the in rem jurisdiction of a court.
C) standing, venue, and other threshold issues.
D) the determination of whether a court can exercise jurisdiction.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Cattle House Steaks, a Colorado company, enters into a contract over the phone with Beef Packing Inc., an out-of-state corporation. If a dispute arises, a Colorado court can exercise jurisdiction over Beef Packing


A) under the minimum-contacts test.
B) on the basis of a federal question.
C) in no circumstances.
D) only if Beef Packing files the suit.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Heyli is not a resident of Iowa although her website can be accessed by residents of that state. Jen files a suit against Heyli in an Iowa state court. The court is most likely to have jurisdiction over Heyli if Jen's claim arises from


A) minimum contacts between Heyli and any Iowa resident.
B) substantial business between Jen and Heyli through Heyli's website.
C) no interactivity between Heyli and any Iowa resident through Heyli's website.
D) the Internet's capacity to bypass boundaries.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The amount of business a corporation does within a state can serve to subject or exempt the firm from that state's jurisdiction.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Franco files a suit in a federal district court against Greta. Franco loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and loses again. Franco asks the United States Supreme Court to hear the case. The Court is


A) not required to hear the case.
B) required to hear the case because Franco lost in a federal court.
C) required to hear the case because Franco lost in a lower court.
D) required to hear the case because it is an appeal.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a suit to compel arbitration, a court will order a dispute to be arbitrated if


A) both parties consented to it.
B) the rules for the arbitration are fair to at least one of the parties.
C) the relevant state or federal statute does not include such claims.
D) all of the choices.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The jurisdiction of the federal courts is limited because


A) the federal government has limited powers.
B) Congress sets the limits.
C) the territory of the United States is limited.
D) the states can exercise their authority under long arm statutes.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Laws would have no discernible meaning without the courts to interpret them.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The United States Supreme Court has held that a mandatory arbitration clause in an employment contract is generally enforceable because in agreeing to the clause, the parties waived


A) their right to sue.
B) the right to engage in other methods of alternative dispute resolution.
C) rights under statutes designed to protect the employee.
D) the right to terminate the employment relationship without cause.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A federal court will apply federal law in a case involving a federal question.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An appellate court will not challenge a trial court's finding of fact, even if the finding is clearly erroneous.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The federal courts are an independent system of courts superior to the state courts.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

False

Juan sued Abram in state court, and lost his case. He immediately appealed to the intermediate level appellate court for his state, where he lost again. After losing again at the state supreme court level, he is so angry that he wants to take his case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Does Juan have the right to have his case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court? What is the procedure he would use to get the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his case?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The United States Supreme Court has appe...

View Answer

The 1803 decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison established


A) the jurisdiction of the courts.
B) the writ of certiorari .
C) the power of judicial review.
D) the rule of four.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the American governmental system, applying the laws to specific situations is the essential role of Congress.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Ovid wants to file a suit against Petra. For a court to hear the case,


A) both parties must consent.
B) the court must have jurisdiction.
C) the parties must have diversity of citizenship.
D) the parties must own property.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A trial court's capacity to directly observe witnesses' gestures, demeanor, and other nonverbal behavior supports the decision of an appellate court to


A) conduct a new trial and re-examine the witnesses.
B) apply the trial court's interpretation of the law in the case.
C) defer to the trial court's findings on questions of fact.
D) focus on what really happened in regard to the dispute.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 1 - 20 of 72

Related Exams

Show Answer