Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

Douros Realty & Construction Co.had a lead on a "prime" piece of real estate.Although Douros did not have a listing agreement with the seller of the property,he contacted Kelley Properties.Douros knew that Kelley was looking for a location for a commercial development.Douros contacted Kelley stating only that he had the "finest,most outstanding,viable location in the county and it just came on the market." Douros said he would reveal the location of the property and the owner's name if Kelley would sign an agreement which would require Kelley to pay a 10% commission if a sale of the property resulted.The agreement was signed.Four months later,Kelley bought the property after negotiating the deal himself.Kelley claims he does not owe a commission to Douros because there was insufficient consideration to support the payment of commission so large.Kelley claims that all Douros did in the entire transaction was to reveal the location of the property and the owner's name.Was there sufficient consideration to make this promise enforceable?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Consideration sufficient to support a co...

View Answer

Section 2-306 of the UCC expressly disallows output contracts in the sale of goods.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Hilda owes Lex $3,000,which is an undisputed amount.If she offers him her car in full settlement of the debt and he accepts,the agreement is binding and he can no longer claim she owes him anything on the original debt.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Denton agreed to build a cedar deck for the Thrashers for $7,000.After he began the work,the Thrashers asked him to add cedar flower boxes at one side.Denton replied he would,but it would cost an additional $600.The Thrashers would not be obligated to pay the additional sum because the original agreement already obligated Denton to complete the deck for $7,000.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Shirley Rhone suffered injuries when a truck struck the vehicle in which she was riding.State Auto Mutual Insurance Co.was the insurer involved and provided personal injury coverage.Shirley went to see Dr.Allen,a chiropractor who provided treatments 32 times over a 3-month period.Dr.Allen billed State Auto in three separate billings.After paying the first two billings in full,State Auto expressed concern about whether Dr.Allen's charges were excessive.State Auto hired Chiropractic Consultants,Inc.to evaluate Dr.Allen's billings.The consultants advised that Dr.Allen's billings were indeed excessive.State Auto then telephoned Dr.Allen and offered a partial payment to settle the account.After this conversation,State Auto issued and sent a check for $864 payable to Dr.Allen.On the face of the check,State Auto noted the total amount allocated to each claim and typed "settlement in full." On the reverse side it said,"The endorsement of this draft by the payee constitutes a clear release and full settlement of the claim or account shown on the other side." Upon receipt of the check,Dr.Allen cashed the check.He then sought payment of an additional $895.State Auto claims there was an accord and satisfaction with respect to the amount due for services rendered by Dr.Allen.What are the requirements of an accord and satisfaction? Were those requirements met in this case?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An accord is the agreement to settle for...

View Answer

Walter worked nights as a clerk in a fast-food store.On his last work shift,Walter's boss told him,"I'm really grateful for the year that you have worked here.I am going to give you a bonus of $1,000 in your last paycheck." When Walter got his last paycheck,there was no bonus.If Walter sues,the likely result will be:


A) Walter will win, as the promise is enforceable.
B) Walter will lose, as he gave no consideration.
C) Walter will lose unless the promise was in writing.
D) Walter will win, as no consideration is required to modify an employment contract.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An illusory promise is valid consideration.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Courts normally require consideration to be approximately equal on both sides of the bargain.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The Kelsoe v.International Wood Products,Inc.case was an example of:


A) promissory estoppel.
B) partial performance.
C) illusory promises.
D) lack of consideration.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Pastor Tom was employed by the First Church for 40 years.On Pastor Tom's retirement there was no adequate pension plan.Two months after the retirement,a wealthy parishioner,in consideration for Pastor Tom's 40 years of faithful service and for being such a "sweet" man,promised to pay him $500 per month for the rest of his life.This promise probably is not enforceable.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Bernie owes an undisputed amount to Wilde's Heating & Air Conditioning.Which of the following is true?


A) If Wilde's agrees to accept less than the full amount as full payment, the agreement is not binding.
B) The undisputed amount is also known as an unliquidated amount.
C) If the parties agree to settle for less than the full amount, their agreement is governed by the ruling in Henches v. Taylor.
D) If Wilde's agrees to accept less than the full amount, the agreement is only binding if it is in writing and signed by Bernie.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Mid-American Oil had a contract with NSB Company to supply 1,000 gallons of oil by September 1.The contract contained a provision which required all modifications to be written and signed by the company presidents.In early August,an executive of Mid-American talked with the purchasing agent of NSB who orally agreed to two shipments of oil; one in September and the second one in December.By September 30,when only 500 gallons had been delivered,NSB sued.The likely outcome of this lawsuit is:


A) NSB wins because the modification was not supported by new consideration.
B) NSB wins because the modification has to be in writing.
C) Mid-American Oil wins because the UCC governs this case and no new consideration is required.
D) Mid-American Oil wins because new consideration was present.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If Rudy offers Oscar $200 for his laptop valued at $600 and Oscar agrees,a court will probably:


A) set aside the agreement as being unfair.
B) set aside the agreement because the consideration is inadequate.
C) not set aside the agreement based on the adequacy of the consideration.
D) not set aside the agreement because of the UCC.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What two exceptions did the UCC create for accord and satisfaction check cases?

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The first Code exception involves "organ...

View Answer

Jamie is building a house on her lot.She invites Earnie of Earnie's Excavation to bid on the excavation job.Earnie observes that the lot next to Jamie's is also under excavation and the soil in that lot is normal and not excessively rocky.Based on the assumption that the soil in Jamie's lot will be similar,he and Jamie agree that the excavation will cost $3,000.When Earnie starts digging,he learns there is solid rock under Jamie's lot.Earnie says it will cost an extra $2,500 for the excavation work.Jamie agrees just to get the job done but later refuses to pay a dime more than $3,000.If Earnie sues,the most likely result would be:


A) Jamie wins, as Earnie was under a preexisting duty to dig the basement.
B) Earnie wins as this modification is governed by the UCC and consideration is not required to enforce a modification of the agreement.
C) Jamie wins as Earnie was not acting in good faith and just wanted to put Jamie in a situation where she didn't have a choice but to agree to more money.
D) Earnie wins, as the modification was due to unforeseen difficulties.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Discuss the concept of consideration.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Consideration is anything that someone m...

View Answer

Mary owes $3,800 on her credit card.She sends the credit card company a check for $800 with the notation "payment in full" on the check.If the credit card issuer cashes the check:


A) Mary's balance will automatically be paid in full if the $3,800 amount was a liquidated debt.
B) Mary's balance will automatically be paid in full regardless of whether the amount of $3,800 was liquidated or unliquidated.
C) the check may be subject to a UCC exception to the general rules for accord and satisfaction cases involving checks.
D) Mary's balance will automatically be paid in full if the $3,800 amount was an unliquidated debt.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

An unliquidated debt can be described as:


A) a debt in which both its existence and amount is in dispute.
B) a debt in which the existence or amount is in dispute.
C) a debt disputed by the creditor but not the debtor.
D) a debt undisputed by either party.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Marco agrees to sell Clowns R Us some balloons.The contract states that Clowns may buy as many balloons as it wishes.This agreement is:


A) a requirements contract.
B) an output contract.
C) an illusory contract.
D) an enforceable contract.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Contracts in which one party agrees to buy all his requirements of certain goods from the other party are generally unenforceable because there is no definite amount.

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 21 - 40 of 46

Related Exams

Show Answer