A) Parker doctrine
B) state action doctrine
C) McCarran-Ferguson Act
D) Noerr-Pennington doctrine
E) National Insurance Act
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) up to 50 years in prison
B) a fine of $1 million
C) a fine of $100 million
D) both a and b are correct
E) both a and c are correct
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) market power
B) profitability
C) market control
D) market proportion
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Standard Oil Co.of New Jersey v.U.S.
B) Broadcast Music,Inc.v.CBS
C) NCAA v.Board of Regents
D) Rylands v.Fletcher
E) Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) be more efficient
B) exercise monopoly power within a region
C) hire fewer workers
D) give better worker benefits
E) diversify into more markets
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) should not be stopped because survival of the industry was important to national security
B) should be stopped because the sellers would have over 75% of the market
C) should be stopped because buyers had insufficient power to insure competitive prices
D) should be stopped because the market was saturated with such firms
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) all vertical price fixing subject to a rule of reason
B) vertical price fixing of maximum retail prices was illegal
C) vertical price fixing may injure the ability of sellers to compete so is generally illegal
D) vertical price fixing may cause dealers to be able to furnish more services in an anticompetitive manner
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) consumers
B) union members
C) retailers
D) wholesalers
E) all of the other specific choices are possible
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) legal if the parties mutually agree (no duress) to lower their prices
B) legal if the price set is reasonable to consumers
C) usually illegal per se under the antitrust laws
D) illegal unless the primary customers of the firms agree with the move
E) legal if the FTC participated in the decision
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) concern over the undue influence banks had over Congress
B) concern about competition faced by U.S.agricultural producers
C) concern that businesses were too influential in state legislatures
D) a desire to end import tariffs
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) boycott pricing
B) vertical discrimination
C) price disparagement
D) boycotting
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) price discounts injures low-income consumers
B) price discounts unfairly target urban areas
C) price discounts give large volume retailers an advantage over small volume retailers
D) price discounts unfairly target urban areas and price discounts give large volume retailers an advantage over small volume retailers
E) price discounts injures low-income consumers and price discounts give large volume retailers an advantage over small volume retailers
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) a tying arrangement
B) resale price maintenance
C) exclusive dealing
D) a consignment arrangement
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Hart-Scott-Rodino Act
B) Lanham Act
C) Clayton Act
D) Norris-LaGuardia Act
E) Wagner Act
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 101 - 120 of 457
Related Exams