A) Door-to-door salespeople
B) Attendees of church services
C) Solicitors of money for charity
D) Persons taking shortcuts across the property
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) an implied assumption of risk.
B) contributory negligence.
C) strict liability.
D) negligence per se.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Strict liability clause
B) Exculpatory clause
C) Limited liability clause
D) Choice of law clause
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Was the breach an actual cause of the injury?
B) Was the injury the type one would expect from the breach?
C) Was the breach a proximate cause of the injury?
D) What was the effect of any intervening cause arising after the breach and helping to cause the injury?
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Parsons will recover against the construction company.
B) Parsons will recover,because construction companies are strictly liable for their employees' acts.
C) Parsons will not recover,because he knowingly and voluntarily assumed the risk of being struck by the beam.
D) Parsons will not recover,because he should have instead sued the worker operating the crane.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) an employer's duty to prevent take-home exposure extends only to members of a worker's household.
B) an employer's duty to prevent take-home exposure extends only to family members of a worker's household.
C) an employer's duty to prevent take-home exposure extends only to immediate family members of a worker's household.
D) an employer does not owe a duty to its workers to prevent take-home exposure.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Strict liability
B) Negligence
C) Premises liability
D) Negligence per se
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) only for the "natural and probable consequences" of his actions.
B) for all injuries sustained by the plaintiff.
C) even for injuries caused by the plaintiff's negligence.
D) for at least 50 percent of the damages.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Substantial factor test
B) Impact test
C) Zone of danger test
D) The Restatement (ThirD) Approach
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Constitutional reform
B) Criminal reform
C) Tort reform
D) Contract reform
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The lawsuit was filed in a contributory negligence state.
B) The lawsuit was filed in a comparative negligence state.
C) Pam is uninsured.
D) Pam's accident was seen as res ipsa loquitur.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) substantial factor
B) zone of danger
C) impact
D) but-for
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) D & J's security measures were unreasonable in light of the risks it was aware of.
B) Lord presented sufficient evidence to withstand D & J's motion for summary judgment,and it is the jury's role to decide if D & J owed her a duty and breached that duty.
C) The armed robbery attempt during which Lord was shot would not have occurred if D & J posted a security guard at the entrance of its check cashing location.
D) Lord failed to present sufficient evidence because she should have presented the testimony of an expert.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No,because she had voluntarily assumed the risk while passing through the deserted road.
B) No,because Rick's sexual assault is an unforeseeable intervening cause.
C) Yes,because the company has breached its duty.
D) Yes,because the tire's failure only resulted in her injury.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Phil will be liable,only if he breached a duty of due care owed to the child.
B) Phil will be liable if the harm that resulted to the child was foreseeable to Phil.
C) Phil will be liable,regardless of the steps that he took to secure the yard.
D) Phil will most likely not be liable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Catherine will not win since she did not sustain any damages.
B) Catherine will not win as maggots in soup are foreseeable.
C) Catherine will win if she proves emotional distress.
D) Catherine will win because the restaurant failed to exercise due care.
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 1 - 20 of 90
Related Exams