A) Agreements regarding marriage in which one party is gaining something other than a return on his or her promise to marry are within the statute of frauds and must be in writing.
B) Mutual promises to marry fall within the statute of frauds.
C) Prenuptial agreements fall within the statute of frauds.
D) A prenuptial agreement is not automatically enforceable just because it is in writing.
E) When one party promises something to the other as part of an offer of marriage, the contract must be in writing to be enforceable.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Relating
B) Adjacent
C) Contracted
D) Attached
E) Pertinent
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Admission
B) Submission
C) Deposition
D) Interrogatory
E) Confirmation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Secondary obligations
B) Primary obligations
C) Secondary promises
D) Collateral promises
E) Suretyship promises
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The promises fall within the statute of frauds.
B) The promises do not fall within the statute of frauds because they involve material matters, not matters involving home and children.
C) The promises do not fall within the statute of frauds unless Sally can prove that she would not have married Bruce without the assurance of the Mercedes and the trip.
D) The promises fall within the statute of frauds unless Bruce can prove that Sally would have married him without the assurance of the Mercedes and the trip.
E) The promises would have fallen within the statute of frauds in earlier times in history, but would not fall within the statute of frauds in this day and time.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Although the parol evidence rule applies to writings created at the same time as the written agreement, these writings tend to be treated differently than prior or contemporaneous oral agreements in that the writings are more readily admitted as part of the written agreement than is oral evidence.
B) Although the parol evidence rule applies to writings created at the same time as the written agreement, these writings tend to be treated differently than prior or contemporaneous oral agreements in that the writings are less likely to be admitted as part of the written agreement than is oral evidence.
C) The parol evidence rule applies to writings created at the same time as the written agreement, and these writings are analyzed in the same way as prior or contemporaneous oral evidence.
D) The parol evidence rule applies to writings created at the same time as the written agreement only if a sale of goods is involved, and in that case the writings are analyzed in the same way as prior or contemporaneous oral evidence.
E) The parol evidence rule does not apply to writings created at the same time as the written agreement.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Harry is correct.
B) Harry is incorrect because while the statute of frauds would require his signature on the document, there is no requirement that the signature be at the end.
C) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require his signature so long as the selling price was referenced.
D) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require his signature so long as the type of subject matter involved was referenced.
E) Harry is incorrect because the statute of frauds did not require his signature so long as the parties were clearly identified.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) $200
B) $300
C) $500
D) $600
E) $1,000
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) To restrict oral evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form.
B) To restrict written evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form.
C) To restrict oral and written evidence from being admitted that supports an agreement in its written form.
D) To restrict hearsay from being admitted that supports or contradicts an agreement in its written form.
E) To restrict evidence from being admitted that substantially contradicts an agreement in its written form.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Contracts related to an interest in land
B) Promises made in consideration of marriage
C) Contracts related to any lease of land or equipment
D) Contracts whose terms prevent possible performance within one year
E) Contracts for one party to pay the debt of another if the initial party fails to pay
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Adhesion
B) Complete
C) Parol
D) Merger
E) Consolidation
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Contracts whose terms prevent possible performance within one year
B) Contracts involving the provision of services
C) Contracts involving the provision of any goods
D) Contracts involving any debt
E) Contracts involving services in relation to computer equipment
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The primary-purpose rule
B) The resulting-fact rule
C) The main-purpose rule
D) The delineated rule
E) The personal-obligation standard
Correct Answer
verified
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Essay
Correct Answer
verified
View Answer
Showing 41 - 60 of 65
Related Exams