FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statementsintra-Entity Asset Transactions

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 1

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012. In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales?

A) Retained earnings.
B) Cost of goods sold.
C) Inventory.
D) Investment in Strickland Company.
E) Sales.

Correct Answer

verified

C

Question 2

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2012. $\begin{array}{lrrr}&2012&2013&2014\\\text { Purchases by Posito } & \$ 8,000 & \$ 12,000 & \$ 15,000 \\\text { Ending inventory on Posito's books } & 1,200 & 4,000 & 3,000\end{array}$ Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. $\begin{array} { l c c c } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 2 } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 3 } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 4 } \\\text { Gargiulo's net income } & \mathbf { \$ 7 0 , 0 0 0 } & \mathbf { \$ 8 5 , 0 0 0 } & \mathbf { \$ 9 4 , 0 0 0 } \\\text { Dividends paid by Gargiulo } & 10,000 & 10,000 & 15,000\end{array}$ For consolidation purposes, what amount would be debited to January 1 retained earnings for the 2013 consolidation worksheet entry with regard to the unrealized gross profit of the 2012 intra-entity transfer of merchandise?

A) $240.
B) $300.
C) $2,000.
D) $1,600.
E) $270.

Correct Answer

verified

B

Question 3

Multiple Choice

Review LaterAdd Note

X-Beams Inc. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Kent Corp. During 2013, Kent made several sales of inventory to X-Beams. The total selling price was $180,000 and the cost was $100,000. At the end of the year, 20% of the goods were still in X-Beams' inventory. Kent's reported net income was $300,000. What was the non-controlling interest in Kent's net income?

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: $\begin{array}{lcc}&\text { Pride, Inc.}&\text { Strong Corp. }\\\text { Revenues } & \$ 420,000 & \$ 280,000 \\\text { Cost of goods sold } & (196,000) & (112,000) \\\text { Operating expenses } & \quad(28,000) & (14,000) \\\text { Net income } & \$ \quad 196,000 & \$ 154,000\\\\\text { Retained earnings, 1/1/13 } & \$ 420,000 & \$ 210,000 \\\text { Net income (above) } & 196,000 & 154,000 \\\text { Dividends paid } & 0 &0 \\\text { Retained earnings, 12/31/13 } & {\$ 616,000}& \$ 364,000\\\\\text { Cash and receivables } & \$ 294,000 & \$ 126,000 \\\text { Inventory } & 210,000 & 154,000 \\\text { Investment in Strong Corp } & 364,000 & 0 \\\text { Equipment (net) } & 616,000 & \underline{420,000} \\\text { Total assets } & \$ 1,484,000 & \$ 700,000\\\\\text { Liabilities } & \$ 588,000 & \$ 196,000 \\\text { Common stock } & 280,000 & 140,000 \\\text { Retained earnings, 12/31/13 (above) } & 616,000 & 264,000\\\text { Total liabilities and stockholders' equity } & \$ 1,484,000 & \$ 700,000 \\\end{array}$ During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013. What is the consolidated total for inventory at December 31, 2013?

Yoderly Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nelson Corp., sold goods to Nelson near the end of 2013. The goods had cost Yoderly $105,000 and the selling price was $140,000. Nelson had not sold any of the goods by the end of the year. Required: Prepare Consolidation Entry TI and Consolidation Entry G that are required for 2013.

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2012. $\begin{array}{lrrr}&2012&2013&2014\\\text { Purchases by Posito } & \$ 8,000 & \$ 12,000 & \$ 15,000 \\\text { Ending inventory on Posito's books } & 1,200 & 4,000 & 3,000\end{array}$ Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. $\begin{array} { l c c c } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 2 } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 3 } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 4 } \\\text { Gargiulo's net income } & \mathbf { \$ 7 0 , 0 0 0 } & \mathbf { \$ 8 5 , 0 0 0 } & \mathbf { \$ 9 4 , 0 0 0 } \\\text { Dividends paid by Gargiulo } & 10,000 & 10,000 & 15,000\end{array}$ Compute the equity in earnings of Gargiulo reported on Posito's books for 2013.

During 2012, Von Co. sold inventory to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lord Co. The inventory cost $30,000 and was sold to Lord for $44,000. From the perspective of the combination, when is the $14,000 gain realized?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012. In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory?

Prince Corp. owned 80% of Kile Corp.'s common stock. During October 2013, Kile sold merchandise to Prince for $140,000. At December 31, 2013, 50% of this merchandise remained in Prince's inventory. For 2013, gross profit percentages were 30% of sales for Prince and 40% of sales for Kile. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit in ending inventory at December 31, 2013 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2012 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: $\begin{array}{lrrr}&2012&2013&2014\\\text { Net income } & \$ 100,000 & \$ 120,000 & \$ 130,000 \\\text { Dividends } & 40,000 & 50,000 & 60,000\end{array}$ Compute the amortization of gain through a depreciation adjustment for 2014 for consolidation purposes.

For each of the following situations, select the correct entry that would be required on a consolidation worksheet.

On January 1, 2012, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc. transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. For consolidation purposes, what net debit or credit will be made for the year 2012 relating to the accumulated depreciation for the equipment transfer?

On January 1, 2012, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc. transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. What is the net effect on consolidated net income in 2012 due to the equipment transfer?

Patti Company owns 80% of the common stock of Shannon, Inc. In the current year, Patti reports sales of $10,000,000 and cost of goods sold of $7,500,000. For the same period, Shannon has sales of $200,000 and cost of goods sold of $160,000. During the year, Patti sold merchandise to Shannon for $60,000 at a price based on the normal markup. At the end of the year, Shannon still possesses 30 percent of this inventory. Assume the same information, except Shannon sold inventory to Patti. Compute consolidated sales.

Bauerly Co. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Devin Co. During 2012, Devin made frequent sales of inventory to Bauerly. There were unrealized gains of $40,000 in the beginning inventory and $25,000 of unrealized gains at the end of the year. Devin reported net income of $137,000 for 2012. Bauerly decided to use the equity method to account for the investment. What is the non-controlling interest's share of Devin's net income for 2012?

Gibson Corp. owned a 90% interest in Sparis Co. Sparis frequently made sales of inventory to Gibson. The sales, which include a markup over cost of 25%, were $420,000 in 2012 and $500,000 in 2013. At the end of each year, Gibson still owned 30% of the goods. Net income for Sparis was $912,000 during 2013. What was the non-controlling interest's share of Sparis' net income for 2013?

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2013, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000. Included in the amounts for Skillet's sales were Skillet's sales of merchandise to Pot for $140,000. There were no sales from Pot to Skillet. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Pot still had 40% of the intra-entity sales as inventory at the end of 2013. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2013?

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2012. $\begin{array}{lrrr}&2012&2013&2014\\\text { Purchases by Posito } & \$ 8,000 & \$ 12,000 & \$ 15,000 \\\text { Ending inventory on Posito's books } & 1,200 & 4,000 & 3,000\end{array}$ Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. $\begin{array} { l c c c } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 2 } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 3 } & \mathbf { 2 0 1 4 } \\\text { Gargiulo's net income } & \mathbf { \$ 7 0 , 0 0 0 } & \mathbf { \$ 8 5 , 0 0 0 } & \mathbf { \$ 9 4 , 0 0 0 } \\\text { Dividends paid by Gargiulo } & 10,000 & 10,000 & 15,000\end{array}$ Compute the equity in earnings of Gargiulo reported on Posito's books for 2012.

Dithers Inc. acquired all of the common stock of Bumstead Corp. on January 1, 2013. During 2013, Bumstead sold land to Dithers at a gain. No consolidation entry for the sale of the land was made at the end of 2013. What errors will this omission cause in the consolidated financial statements?

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc. sold land to Parker on May 1, 2012, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2012 for $92,000 in 2014. Compute the gain or loss on the intra-entity sale of land.