Alan entered into a written contract for the purchase of a house owned by Joe. As the time to move approached, Alan discovered that Joe was refusing to move out and refusing to transfer the property. Apparently a dissatisfied customer had driven through the showroom window of Joe's new car dealership, causing him considerable expense. Joe could no longer afford to purchase the new luxury home into which he had intended to move. Which of the following is the appropriate remedy in these circumstances for Alan, who really wants the house?

A) Specific performance
B) Damages
C) Injunction
D) No remedy
E) Rescission

Question

Jennifer Storey · Accepted Answer

Final Answer : A, Explanation :  Specific performance is the appropriate remedy because it is an equitable remedy that compels a party to execute the contract according to its precise terms when monetary damages are inadequate to remedy the harm, particularly relevant in real estate transactions where each property is considered unique.

Definitions

Learning Objectives

Learning Objectives

Related questions