Asked by
Verified
While comparative negligence is generally not a defense in a strict liability case, contributory negligence generally is a successful defense.
Comparative Negligence
A legal doctrine that apportions damages based on the degree of fault attributable to each party in a lawsuit.
Strict Liability
A principle that holds parties accountable for damages irrespective of preventive measures or caution exercised.
Contributory Negligence
A legal principle where if a party can be shown to have contributed to their own injury or loss, they may be barred from recovering damages.
- Acquire knowledge on the basics and repercussions of strict liability.
- Gain insight into how modern doctrines like comparative negligence and assumption of risk are assimilated and affect traditional systems of negligence.
Verified Answer
Learning Objectives
- Acquire knowledge on the basics and repercussions of strict liability.
- Gain insight into how modern doctrines like comparative negligence and assumption of risk are assimilated and affect traditional systems of negligence.
Related questions
A Tiger Gets Loose from the Tent of a Circus ...
Abnormally Dangerous Activity Strict Liability Is Imposed for Any Activity ...
Some States Have Today Merged the Implied Assumption of Risk ...
A Number of States Have Abolished or Modified the Defense ...
Wild Life LLC Keeps and Displays Domestic and Wild Animals ...